Why does Meloni's hunting reform mean pressure at home and a clash with Brussels?
The story is primarily an Italian and European one; Belgium enters chiefly as a fellow member state where hunting is legislated by the regions inside the same EU framework, making Rome's push a precedent worth watching from Flanders and Wallonia.
In 30 seconds
- Politico Europe reports Meloni's government is advancing a hunting reform popular with rural constituencies but likely to clash with the European Commission.
- National hunting law in the EU must stay within the Birds Directive (2009/147/EC) and Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC).
- The Commission can open infringement proceedings and refer member states to the European Court of Justice over breaches.
- Meloni's coalition comprises Fratelli d'Italia, the Lega and Forza Italia; she has led Italy's government since October 2022.
Italy's coalition government, led by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni (Fratelli d'Italia) with the Lega (Matteo Salvini) and Forza Italia, is advancing a reform of national hunting rules. The measure appeals to rural and hunting constituencies but, as reported by Politico Europe, risks conflict with the European Commission because national hunting law must operate within the EU Birds Directive (2009/147/EC) and Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC). Enforcement of those directives runs through the Commission, which can launch infringement proceedings and refer states to the European Court of Justice. Belgium is relevant only as a comparison: there, hunting is a regional (not federal) competence exercised inside the same EU framework.
Background
EU protection of wild birds dates to the 1979 Birds Directive (79/409/EEC), codified as 2009/147/EC, complemented by the 1992 Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC). These set the ceiling under which national parliaments may regulate hunting, closed seasons and protected sites. Hunting has repeatedly been a political flashpoint in Italy along urban–rural lines, and the current dispute fits a wider European pattern in which national governments test the resilience of the EU's environmental rules — seen also in fights over wolf protection, the Nature Restoration Law and pesticides.
What to do
For now the practical effect is limited to Italy. For readers elsewhere in the EU, including Belgium, the case signals how firmly Brussels intends to police national deviations from the wildlife directives — the framework within which Flanders and Wallonia already set their own hunting seasons and rules.
Impact
Regional — In Belgium hunting is a regional competence — Flanders, Wallonia and the Brussels-Capital Region each set their own rules within the EU directives. A Commission ruling against Italy would clarify the outer limits for Belgian regional hunting law too, giving Walloon and Flemish hunting federations and conservation groups an indirect stake in the outcome.
EvidenceDeveloping · 1 primary source + 2 official documents · some details remain unconfirmedExplore evidence →Hide evidence ↑
- Publication date unavailable
- Retrieved by ODIN:
- 4 Aug 2026
- Published:
- 30 Nov 2009, 01:00
- Retrieved by ODIN:
- 4 Aug 2026
- Published:
- 21 May 1992, 02:00
- Retrieved by ODIN:
- 4 Aug 2026
Continue reading
This story was assembled from verified evidence, with its sources and reasoning recorded as it was written.