Will €440,000 put healthier food on the table for Brussels preschoolers?

The 27 participating schools belong to Brussels’ Dutch-language education system. In Belgium’s divided education structure, that distinction matters more than the commune or gemeente in which a family lives. A child attending a Nederlandstalige school in Brussels-City, Anderlecht or another of the capital’s 19 municipalities comes under the Flemish education framework; a child at a French-language école maternelle comes under the French Community’s arrangements instead.

The VGC is permitted to apply for the Flemish funding on behalf of Dutch-language institutions throughout the Brussels-Capital Region. The City of Brussels, a local commune/gemeente or an individual school board may still be involved operationally, but parents do not submit the subsidy application themselves. Nor should they assume that all Dutch-language schools are included: the reported award covers 27 named participating schools, not the entire network.

Parents should look for a message from the school through its usual platform, email channel or paper correspondence. Because Dutch is the administrative language of these schools, the formal notice may be in Dutch even when families use French, English or another language at home. Parents who need clarification can ask the secretariat for help understanding the menu or registration procedure. Questions about halal, vegetarian, medically prescribed or allergy-safe food should be put directly to the school; VRT NWS

Organisation

VRT NWS

Public-service news outlet providing earlier reporting on lunchboxes and Brussels school-meal choices.

Why it matters

Public-service news outlet providing earlier reporting on lunchboxes and Brussels school-meal choices.

About

VRT NWS is the main news channel of the Flemish national broadcasting company VRT. It has an associated website which provides text articles on news, analyses, and general background information.

Official site ↗View source record ↗

For a useful conversation with the school, families can ask four concrete questions: whether the programme covers breakfast, snacks or lunch; on which days food is provided; whether children must still bring a lunchbox; and how dietary or medical information must be supplied. A doctor’s certificate may be requested for some medical diets, but the newly announced funding framework does not itself establish one Brussels-wide parental form.

The programme is not simply a response to visibly empty lunchboxes. A 2023 study by Ghent University and the Flemish Institute for Healthy Living, reported by VRT NWS, examined 1,051 pupils in 25 Flemish primary schools. Only three children had an empty lunchbox on the observation day, yet 9% of participating pupils reported frequent food insecurity over the preceding year. The study also found that lunchbox contents were often nutritionally weak and that schools faced financial, infrastructure and staffing barriers when trying to provide meals.

Those findings explain the policy’s broader approach. School food can address hunger without singling out individual children, while also improving the everyday diet of pupils whose lunchboxes are full but unbalanced. The Flemish Institute for Healthy Living argues that an accessible offer can support health and equal educational opportunity, although it cautions that there is no quick, identical solution for every school.

The current Flemish framework, approved in April 2026, asks participating local authorities to provide at least €34 per pupil per school year, with the Flemish government contributing €136. It bars authorities from using a parental contribution to meet that required local share. The official Vlaanderen.be portal says €36.5 million is available for the 2026–27 school year across participating local programmes, including VGC Brussels.

Supporters of a broad school offer, including Flemish welfare minister Caroline Gennez and participating authorities, argue that shared provision avoids stigma and helps all children build healthy habits while they are young. This treats healthy food at school as a normal educational condition rather than emergency aid for a visibly poor minority.

Other constituencies raise practical questions. The Flemish Association of Cities and Municipalities previously warned that co-financed food programmes could add coordination work for local authorities. Researchers speaking with socially vulnerable parents also found that some families preferred an affordable meal they could pay for rather than an offer framed as charity. Schools must consequently make access straightforward without labelling children, while ensuring that kitchens, suppliers and staff can sustain what is promised.

For the 27 Brussels schools, the next test is delivery. Families should receive school-level details on menus, timing and dietary procedures as the academic year begins. The VGC and Flemish authorities have not yet published, in the reporting reviewed for this article, a detailed public breakdown showing how much each school will spend on breakfasts, snacks or warm meals, or the indicators by which the Brussels programme will be evaluated. Those figures will determine whether nearly half a million euros becomes a durable part of school life or remains a useful but limited annual intervention.