What do the attacks on two transgender women reveal about safety in central Brussels?
Two transgender women were assaulted twice and robbed in central Brussels during the night of 22 to 23 August, police confirmed, and no suspect had been arrested by 25 August.
In 30 seconds
- The attacks occurred during the night of 22 to 23 August in central Brussels.
- A phone and handbag were stolen during the first reported confrontation.
- The women were attacked again near Rue de Bodegem and escaped to contact police.
- Police recorded violent theft and incitement to discrimination, violence or hatred.
Two transgender women were assaulted twice and robbed in central during the night of Saturday 22 to Sunday 23 August, the Brussels-Capital/Ixelles police zone confirmed. The assailants escaped with a mobile phone and handbag, and no suspect had been arrested by Tuesday morning. Police spokesperson Robin De Becker said officers had recorded suspected violent theft and incitement to discrimination, violence or hatred.
The case concerns Brussels as a city before it concerns Brussels as the seat of the European Union. It happened on streets used by residents, visitors and people attending the capital's LGBTQIA+ venues, and it raises an immediate question about whether members of that community can move safely through the centre at night. For Belgium-based readers, including EU staff and expatriates, the institutional connection is nonetheless close: Belgian authorities must investigate the alleged offences, while the European Commission's new equality strategy identifies hate-motivated violence as a persistent problem across the Union.
According to the account one victim gave BRUZZ, the first confrontation took place near Manneken Frites on Rue du Midi, close to Brussels' LGBTQIA+ quarter. She said men made transphobic remarks before one of them struck her friend. The attackers allegedly took the women's phone and handbag and fled. The victims then considered going to a nightclub but decided to return home.
BRUZZ reported that they were attacked again near Rue de Bodegem by two people who got out of a vehicle. De Becker confirmed that the victims received several blows but managed to escape and alert police. One woman told the broadcaster that she had been hit on the head; her friend was reportedly pulled by the hair and sustained open wounds to her face and neck. Authorities have not publicly established whether the same people carried out both attacks, whether the victims required hospital treatment or whether investigators have obtained useful camera footage.
The distinction between what the victims allege and what investigators can prove matters. The police classification shows that a possible discriminatory dimension is being examined; it does not itself establish the attackers' identities, motive or guilt. A court would ultimately determine whether a discriminatory motive had been demonstrated and should aggravate any sentence. No public response from a Brussels regional or political office had been reported in the sources reviewed by publication time.
The victims' framing is broader than a robbery: their account places alleged transphobic abuse immediately before physical violence. Police, by contrast, must preserve the procedural distinction between that testimony and a legally proven hate motive. Belgian equality bodies add a third perspective. The Institute for the Equality of Women and Men found that 83.7% of transgender and non-binary respondents in its 2025 national study had experienced discrimination during the preceding two years. Its director, Michel Pasteel, described discrimination as remaining “omnipresent” and transgender people's wellbeing as markedly below that of the general population.
Where this is happening
View on map Brussels →Unia, the federal equality body, and the Institute have also warned that official complaints reveal only part of the problem because many victims do not report abuse. Their May 2026 assessment recorded 94 discrimination reports in 2025 from transgender, non-binary or intersex people, alongside 454 reports concerning transphobic hateful conduct or speech; 392 of the latter related to a single media publication, so the figure should not be read as 454 separate street incidents. RainbowHouse Brussels and the Walloon federation Prisme linked the wider climate partly to increasingly reactionary and anti-gender discourse online.
At EU level, the European Commission says hate-motivated harassment has risen even as social acceptance has improved. Its 2026-2030 LGBTIQ+ Equality Strategy promises stronger intelligence-gathering, support for equality bodies and action against online hate, but policing and prosecution of this Brussels case remain primarily Belgian responsibilities. The investigation must now identify the attackers and clarify whether the two episodes were connected. Until then, the confirmed facts establish serious violence and theft; the alleged transphobic motive remains central to the inquiry but unproven.
What to do
People who witnessed either attack during the night of 22 to 23 August, particularly around Anneessens or Rue de Bodegem, can provide information to the Brussels-Capital/Ixelles police zone. Anyone reporting comparable violence should preserve messages, photographs, medical records and details of discriminatory remarks, and ask that the alleged bias element be included in the police record. Those experiencing gender-identity discrimination can also contact the Institute for the Equality of Women and Men. Readers following the case should note that, as of 25 August, police reported no arrest.
Impact
Regional — The attacks occurred in the Anneessens area of the City of Brussels, close to the LGBTQIA+ quarter. Their immediate significance concerns public safety, nightlife and confidence in reporting hate-related violence in the Brussels-Capital Region.
EvidenceWell established · 1 primary source + 3 official documents + 2 independent reporting sourcesExplore evidence →Hide evidence ↑
- Published:
- 24 Aug 2026, 02:00
- Retrieved by ODIN:
- 27 Aug 2026
- Published:
- 25 Aug 2026, 02:00
- Retrieved by ODIN:
- 27 Aug 2026
- Published:
- 24 Aug 2026, 02:00
- Retrieved by ODIN:
- 27 Aug 2026
- Published:
- 20 Nov 2025, 01:00
- Retrieved by ODIN:
- 27 Aug 2026
- Published:
- 13 May 2026, 02:00
- Retrieved by ODIN:
- 27 Aug 2026
- Published:
- 8 Oct 2025, 02:00
- Retrieved by ODIN:
- 27 Aug 2026
Voices & reactions
What the main actors are doing
Reported positions, summarised — not direct quotationsVictims and Brussels LGBTQIA+ community
The victim's testimony frames the violence as explicitly transphobic because hostile remarks allegedly preceded the first blows. RainbowHouse Brussels and other community organisations place such incidents within a broader climate of insecurity, underreporting and increasingly reactionary anti-LGBTIQ+ discourse.
Police and judicial framing
The Brussels-Capital/Ixelles police recorded both violent theft and incitement to discrimination, violence or hatred, preserving the possible bias element in the investigation. That classification is not a finding of guilt: investigators and, eventually, a court must establish who attacked the women and whether discriminatory hostility motivated the offences.
Belgian and EU equality institutions
The Institute for the Equality of Women and Men describes discrimination against transgender people as “omnipresent”, while the European Commission treats rising hate-motivated harassment as a Union-wide structural concern. Their framing extends beyond one criminal file to prevention, data collection, victim support and enforcement.
The story, connected
Explore the people, places and ideas in this story
Go beyond the headline. Open a card for sourced context, maps, official links and the other subjects connected to this report.
Continue reading
This story was assembled from verified evidence, with its sources and reasoning recorded as it was written.