Can emergency buttons make Puurs-Sint-Amands staff safer when aggression erupts?
Puurs-Sint-Amands has activated fixed and wearable emergency buttons for municipal employees following incidents of verbal and physical aggression, giving staff a discreet way to summon trained colleagues and, where necessary, the emergency services.
In 30 seconds
- Puurs-Sint-Amands invested about €20,000 in fixed and wearable emergency alarms.
- Alerts from fixed buttons are transmitted to tablets distributed inside the municipal building.
- About 50 wearable devices are available for employees working outside municipal premises.
- Belgian employers must assess violence from third parties and maintain a register for relevant incidents.
has put a new emergency-button system into operation for municipal employees working at public counters, in meeting rooms and on home visits, following incidents of verbal and physical aggression. The practical change is straightforward: staff who feel threatened can discreetly press a fixed button or activate a wearable device instead of first reaching for a telephone. reported on 25 August that the equipment had been tested and was ready for use.
The Dutch-language system is described locally as noodknoppen or paniekknoppen. Fixed buttons have been installed beneath desks at counters, reception points and consultation rooms in the gemeentehuis, according to . An alert is sent to tablets distributed around the building so trained colleagues can respond and contact the emergency services when required. About 50 watch-style devices are available for employees working away from municipal premises, including those making potentially difficult home visits. The wearable devices can also issue an automatic alert if the user loses consciousness, Mayor Koen Van den Heuvel told the newspaper.
The municipality invested approximately €20,000 in the system, Het Nieuwsblad reported. Van den Heuvel said serious incidents remained rare in Puurs-Sint-Amands but included verbal abuse, occasional physical aggression and an episode in which someone threw a brick towards the reception area. The mayor presented the devices as a source of greater reassurance for employees, rather than evidence that ordinary contact with the gemeente or OCMW has become broadly unsafe.
What employees elsewhere in Belgium can do
Anyone working for a Belgian commune, gemeente, OCMW or CPAS who faces aggression should first follow the employer’s immediate safety procedure and contact the emergency services where danger is imminent. Afterwards, the employee can ask the vertrouwenspersoon in Dutch, personne de confiance in French, or the prevention adviser responsible for psychosocial matters how the incident will be recorded and what support is available. These contact details should appear in the work regulations or internal staff information.
Belgian employers whose personnel deal with members of the public must maintain a register of incidents involving third parties, the federal employment administration explains. An employee who believes they experienced workplace violence, harassment or unwanted sexual conduct by a third party must be able to have a statement entered in that register. Entries are normally kept for five years, and the employee’s identity is generally omitted unless they agree to its inclusion.
There is an important legal distinction: recording an event in the register is not the same as filing a formal request for psychosocial intervention, and registration alone does not automatically activate protection against reprisals. Employees considering a formal procedure should therefore speak to the prevention adviser for psychosocial aspects rather than assume an incident report completes every necessary step. The federal portal werk.belgie.be provides Dutch and French explanations, procedures and a model third-party incident register.
Employers must also designate specialised psychological support for workers affected by violence from third parties, according to the same federal guidance. Where the cost is not covered through social security—for example through recognition as an occupational accident—the employer must pay for that specialised intervention.
A wider Flemish reassessment
The installation belongs to a broader review of safety in Flemish public services after Boone’s death. The Association of Flemish Cities and Municipalities, VVSG, said in August 2026 that numerous OCMWs had revised aggression protocols, altered waiting and interview rooms, introduced alarms for home visits and made incidents a regular subject of team discussions. VVSG’s recent monitoring nevertheless found that most client conversations remained neutral or smooth. It classified an average of 14% as more difficult while stressing that a difficult conversation does not automatically involve aggression and that explicit aggression was reported infrequently.
This distinction is important for residents, including newcomers who may already find Belgian administration intimidating. Safety measures should protect employees without turning an ordinary disagreement, incomplete file or language difficulty into a security event. In Dutch-speaking Puurs-Sint-Amands, residents should expect municipal services principally in Dutch. Someone who does not understand a decision or requested document can ask staff to repeat the explanation, provide written instructions or indicate whether interpretation support is possible; availability is not guaranteed, and bringing a trusted interpreter may be useful for a complex appointment.
For the municipality, the next test is no longer installation but performance: whether alerts reach the right people, whether staff feel confident using them and whether incident records reveal recurring risks that require changes to rooms, staffing or appointment procedures. Puurs-Sint-Amands has not publicly provided a target response time, a full incident count or evaluation criteria for the system. Those are the figures to watch when the gemeente assesses whether the buttons deliver more than a safer feeling.
What to do
Residents using Puurs-Sint-Amands municipal or OCMW services do not need to register, pay a fee or take action because of the new system. During a threatening encounter, an employee may discreetly activate an alarm, bringing trained colleagues and potentially emergency services into the response. Municipal employees should follow their employer’s alarm, reporting and follow-up procedures and record relevant third-party aggression in the required register. Staff should also know that logging an incident alone does not amount to submitting a formal psychosocial-intervention request; that remains a separate workplace procedure.
Impact
Regional — The measure reflects a wider reassessment of aggression protocols among Flemish local authorities and OCMWs following the killing of a Ghent social worker during a home visit in August 2025.
EvidenceWell established · 1 primary source + 2 official documents + 1 independent reporting source · Background sources: 1Explore evidence →Hide evidence ↑
- Published:
- 25 Aug 2026, 02:00
- Retrieved by ODIN:
- 26 Aug 2026
- Published:
- 25 Aug 2026, 02:00
- Retrieved by ODIN:
- 26 Aug 2026
- Published:
- 24 Nov 2025, 01:00
- Retrieved by ODIN:
- 26 Aug 2026
- Publication date unavailable
- Retrieved by ODIN:
- 26 Aug 2026
- Published:
- 13 Aug 2026, 02:00
- Retrieved by ODIN:
- 26 Aug 2026
Voices & reactions
What the main actors are doing
Reported positions, summarised — not direct quotationsMunicipal management and frontline staff
The municipality presents discreet alarms, trained responders and aggression-response instruction as practical safeguards that can shorten the time needed to summon help and give employees greater confidence at counters or during home visits.
Public-service accessibility advocates
Residents’ advocates and social-service professionals have an interest in ensuring that tighter security does not stigmatise OCMW clients or turn ordinary frustration, incomplete paperwork and language difficulties into security incidents. They favour prevention, clear communication and de-escalation alongside alarms.
Workplace-prevention specialists
Belgian federal guidance treats equipment as one component of a broader prevention policy. Risk assessment, staff training, incident registration, room design, emergency procedures and psychological support remain necessary because a button cannot prevent every confrontation or address its causes.
The story, connected
Explore the people, places and ideas in this story
Go beyond the headline. Open a card for sourced context, maps, official links and the other subjects connected to this report.
Continue reading
This story was assembled from verified evidence, with its sources and reasoning recorded as it was written.